Management Assignment Samples

250+ Completed Orders/day

100+ Subjects

4.9/5 Ratings

24/7 Support

Assignment Sample On Theory Of Motivation

Download - 1 | Published :31st March 2016

Question:- Select three of the theories that you believe will be most useful in managing your staff. Address the following:

1. Explain why you find the three theories you selected most helpful.

2. Explain whether you anticipate needing different motivational methods according to the ages, races, national origins, cultures, genders, and educational backgrounds of your subordinates. 

Answer:-

1.0 Introduction

Motivation is a process which directly affects on the performance of the individual and focusing on the behavior strength. According to Balasanian, M.(2015),it is mainly based on the group occurrence. It effects on the behavior of the person and the determination of the strength of that person who is employed under such managerial groups.

2.0 Addressing The Motivational Theories

Being a manager of a company, three theories are selected this week on the base of the motivational prospective. Those theories are very useful for managing the employees of the company. The following theories are Vroom’s Expectancy Theory, Behavior Modification Theory and Equity Theory of Motivation.

3.0 Explanation of Three Theories in terms of help

The first theory is Vroom’s Theory. The basic impact of that theory is to put a fourth effort which is very much required to increase the performance level of employee in the company. In the middle of the theory, mainly employee focuses on the process of how to behave in a company.

 The second theory is Behavior Modification Theory. In that theory, managerial behavior have to be built for the cheering the employees’ behavior. The main prospect of that theory is to getting positive behavior from the employees who is very much acceptable and suitable for all age’s employee in the company.

The third theory is Equity Theory of Motivation. In this theory, the main basic elements is to an idea which is basically depends on the effects and the rewards of the employee reward ratio is not equivalent to others input reward percentage and then those inequity depends on the situation of the work.

4.0 Explain different motivational methods in terms of subordinates

Being a manager of a company, there are three different types of methods are there.

4.1 Vroom’s Expectancy Theory: According to Balasanian (2015), the main impact of this model is forth effort, which is belongs to all age’s employee who worked under such managerial department. (Koo et al. 2015), those will be a rewarded performance in the company. For the employee, in this model, prize is a lovely outcome and every employee loves this model and this model is very helpful for them.

4.2 Behavior Modification Theory: According to Friedrich (2013), in this model, the main goal has to be set for every company and those are the main motivative part of company and as well as employee who work under all ages, genders under such managerial group of subordinates. Those goals are very unambiguous, demanding but possible. Those goals are depends on the educational background and ages.

4.3 Equity Theory of Motivation: Basically those models are depends on the equation between changing inputs and the changing outputs of jobs which is done by employee under different age’s managers. Those person who work hard, gets more responsibility then others who don’t get such outputs. The main advantage of this model is, getting transferred to another position if that person will not be suitable for that work.

5.0   Listed theories in order to real work environment

5.1 Vroom’s Expectancy Theory: The main element is forth effort, which is basically employee focuses on the process of how to behave in a company (Ranellucci et al. 2015).

5.2 Behavior Modification Theory: managerial behavior have to be built for the cheering the employees’ behavior.

5.3 Equity Theory of Motivation: The main basic elements are to an idea which is basically depends on the effects and the rewards of the employee. 

References List

Balasanian, M. (2015). MOTIVATION OF INNOVATIONS. GISAP:PS, (7). doi:10.18007/gisap:ps.v0i7.943

Friedrich, D. (2013). Belief and Motivation. Theoria, 80(3), 255-268. doi:10.1111/theo.12030

Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2014). Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Motivation Science, 1(S), 73-90. doi:10.1037/2333-8113.1.s.73

Ranellucci, J., Hall, N., & Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement Goals, Emotions, Learning, and Performance: A Process Model. Motivation Science. doi:10.1037/mot0000014

 

Our Exclusive Features

A Direct Network For Student & Experts

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

A Direct Network For Student & Experts

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

A Direct Network For Student & Experts

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

A Direct Network For Student & Experts

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

Top Experts

Haven’t taken a decision yet?

Hurry! Time is running out. Place your order with us now and be the topper of your class.

I accept the T&C and other policies of the website and agree to receive offers and updates.
CHAT NOW ORDER NOW